There are no other news about that particular woman who is honest and truthful about her story (ies) about other people. Her blog died a natural death because of cancer! Until now I haven't seen her true face. What she looks like? Did she ever look like a diva? Was she too brutally honest about her news story and her direct interpretation about so many of the "characters" in her blog post? Uhm, I wont be able to see her face then. I am so curious. Somebody or people close to her "closed or shut down her site?" For whatever reason aside from she's sleeping most of the time because she's on sleeping pills to relieve the pain of cancer? What could be? There could be so many reasons. I can blog post them all here and it will occupy the whole 5x5 page of this blog space. Anyway wish her well. She should continue blogging if she's doing fine because we need honest people in the blogging community. As much as possible we need bloggers who are not afraid to face the truth whatever the consequences maybe.
What do you think? Is fiction better in reporting detailed information? Divergent thinking? Why should we pay attention to lies? Distortion of news and blogs' information. It's okay to be straight forward than lie to death and fool all the people who read your blog. I love reading blogs that c0-relate to my own story with sincerity, with being straight forward, walang paligoy-ligoy pa. I am not here to blog post so many lies. For what? I'm here to post whatever is about me and what makes me happy. If that didn't make you happy then you can go to the next blog and compare. That's how it is being absorbed here. You don't like the blogger find another blog that makes you more at ease or comfy with. Choosing the blogs of others set you to believe that you read that blog because it makes you happy, it entertains you, you can relate with their story, you like the blogger not because of her personality but the manner of story-telling. There is certain characteristic, personality and charisma that blogger is making you more at ease, or the attraction is simply mutual. There are bloggers here in the blogworld that are very generous in giving yes the act of giving important valuable assets of blogging and informing you like her blog is an open book. Other bloggers are generous GIVING free books for having hundred thousand readers, some other items are being donated so that you can follow them on their provided sites. There are literary agents who posted almost "the whole book." As if they are ones who wrote it? Or maybe they are and they re-write it on their blogs and you are benefitting from that source of info. There are so many young bloggers who are higly intellectual but the question of those "prodigy" who can write like as if they are so mature and highly intellectual human beings well excuse me for I do write my blogs without pompous attraction because on how you write your literary writings like as if you are or you have Ph. D and Master's Degree in Literature or maybe yes indeed you have mastery and skills in Lit. I know cannot compare myself with the most experienced writer and novelist for they are great in asking the help of more than ten copy writers and editors to make their book worthwhile. An agent once told pointblank that it is your blog, it is your book but once they got hold of your manuscript then it's for their own perusal to make it "bigger" and do the necessary corrections, assumptions, and manipulation. What happened at the end result? You the writer is only acknowledged on the "plot story" and the rest of the whole story was "dismembered, chopped, and cut for their own good." Some movies are just like that > too many cut and editing. End result? Not good story anymore and you paid the whole story but you end up at the loose end. And you wonder why so many new authors would rather hire themselves to do all the works minus those people cutting in the good stuff and they want to be paid?
Call it a "single's kraft." A good writer needs only himself if he is a man. If he's a woman, herself is the writer. It takes two to tango. Three is a crowd. You need a good book. GOOD BOOK doesn't mean great. It's just GOOD! The third book is about Webster's and the fourth is a Grammar and Literary Book. Not all writers are fluent in all the languages combined. When they all can laugh at Shakespeare's and old age writers in the Reinnasance period because the vocabulary words in that period of time is such a laughing stock however who is laughing at those famous actors and writers now? You know what I mean? It takes time to find true words in a time when almost everyone thinks they are literate. Okay give me your light if you have it.
